Archive for January, 2008

Crytallised!

January 29, 2008

circus-crystallised-resized.jpg

Crystallised! Achieved by applying another filter in Adobe Photoshop!

I find this image more fascinating than the previous ‘Mosaic Effect’. At first glance, I was all ready to trash this image because I couldn’t quite make out what it was. Then, I realised that as I narrow my eyes, a clearer image emerged! Unlike the ‘mosaic effect’, where I knew what to expect, I didn’t expect this image to have this effect at all!

Mosaic Effect

January 25, 2008

circus-mosaic-21-resized.jpg

In this piece, I used Adobe Photoshop filters to create this mosaic effect. By so doing, the whole image is broken down to little squares… How does it affect the way the image it viewed?

circus-mosaic-cropped.jpg   circus-mosaic-cropped-zoom.jpg 

It depends on the size of each ‘mosaic’ in relation to the size of the whole image. If the size of each ‘mosaic’ is big and the overall size of the image is small, the image may be less legible from near. The image may only be visible when the viewer stands a distance from the image. With this effect, if viewed from a close range, some viewers may not even be aware of the meaning behind the image. As they move away from the image and start to view the work as a whole, they may start to realise that what they thought were mere squares of random colours actually form a coherent image. In viewing this image (with the moasic effect), the initial fascination with the image may not be with what this image is about but rather the process of how the image becomes clearer and reveals itself as one moves away from the image.

e08d3464-02.jpg   seurat-circus-detail-2-011.jpg 

In a way, this image echoes Seurat’s Divisionist style because his original painting is composed of multi-coloured dots. A full appreciation of his work would be from a distance, as the dots would juxtapose and allow the viewer’s eyes to blend colours optically, rather than having the colours blend on the canvas or pre-blended as a material pigment.

This ‘mosaic’ effect of breaking down the whole picture into squares (pixels) makes the re-creation of this piece of work more possible for many people, in particular crafters, who are into cross-stitching and the likes. I must also mention, though, that I do enjoy cross-stitching and find it therapeutic but there not much creativity involved in the craft. May I be so bold as to suggest that Seurat may not have felt particularly creative while he was caught up with the laborious process of ‘dotting’ his large 185 cm x 150 cm masterpiece 😛 !

How would Matisse have interpreted THE CIRCUS?

January 18, 2008

circus-graphic-resize.jpg

If Matisse were to re-interpret Seurat’s The Circus, how would he have done it?

Matisse was considered one of the greatest colourist of the 20th century. He was fond of using bright and expressive colours. His paintings during his Fauvist years are characterized by dramatically simplified areas of pure color, flat shape, and strong pattern. Towards the last few years of his life, even as he was too weak to paint, he created papercuts, carving and scissoring out coloured paper into shapes, and collaging them into sometimes vast pictures.

Maybe he would have done it as above… 🙂

Works of art on various products

January 11, 2008
An image may have its own effects, but these are always mediated by the many and various uses to which it is put. (Rose, 2002, p 14)

With increasing commercialisation, reproductions of art works are common and these may be reproduced on many products and souvenirs by various organisations. Examples abound, such as umbrellas and mugs by museums, stamps by the state and images of art works on even T-shirts, coasters, paper plates and cups, balls and toys by enterprising companies. Below are examples of some products that have art works reproduced on them.

circus-stamp-27.jpg  2807855969.jpg 

182188836.jpg  71035301.jpg 

How does this affect the way the image is viewed?

Well, in my opinion, it depends on what product it is imprinted on, the purpose tthe image serve on product and who produces and distributes the product…

A work of art printed on a stamp would be seen as an honour, while a poorly reproduced image on a ball for children to play would seem to ‘cheapen’ the work of art.

FRAMES MATTER!

January 4, 2008

frame-1.jpg  frame3.jpg

frame-2.jpg  Just another thought…

The type of frames, the  design of the frame, the materials that the frame is made out of (wood, plastic etc..) and the colour also play an important role in the viewers’ engagement with the image…

The original masterpiece in solid timber frame would probably be taken more seriously and generate more interest and discussion than a print in a plastic frame. The type of frames gives a subtle cue to the value of the image.